Summary jurisdiction granted two hundred and four warrants upon all Europeans Taxpayers who had not complied with the Government notifications published in the Government Gazette of the 12th, 15th, and 18th of August calling for payment at the Treasury, on or before the last day of that month of all Rates assessed and due for the third quarter of the current year.
I have no doubt that the occupant of lot No 145 was and is liable. The date shown in the notice I am at a loss to understand why the 18th September was inserted therein in lieu of the last day in August as provided in the Government notifications I have cited. The insertions in "Pencil" are also irregular and the attention of Mr de Souza, whose error it was, should have been called to it.
More to the point, attention had already been drawn to the defective notice which had been sent to me previously. This was done unofficially to give Mr Forth opportunities to rectify his mistake. The Notification was inserted in the weekly Gazette and reproduced in that official publication for three Saturdays consecutively.
It appears he took no steps to do so. It may be that the clerk who called at the Office of Police and Lighting Rate on the 3rd Instant was, in substance, informed at that office that the gathering of the Tax under consideration had passed from the Treasury to the Court of Summary Process, but I feel confident that nothing more could have passed.
With regard to the "Date" inserted in the notice, the clerical error of Mr de Souza may by implication have fallen into. The authority which could not be set aside was the Government Notification.
(Signed) Fred Forth
16
Summary furisdiction granted two hundred and four
warrants upon all
Europeans Taxpayers who had not complied with the Government notifications published in the Government Gazette of the 128, 8. th of 1st and and 18th of August calling for payment
at the Treasury,
on or
before the last day
Im that month of all Rates assessed and due for the third quarter of the current
and
I have
no doubt that the
year, joccupant of lot Ne 145 was and is
15th 22nd August.
The date showed the notice I am at a loss to understand
have been inserted before Mr Forth the notice
signed
see above
This was dome
in
Consequence of
why the 18th September
was
therein inserted in lien of the last day in Augerst as provided in the Government notifications I have cited: The insertions in "Pencil" is
also irregular and the attention of MW de
had already
Souza whose
error
it
was,
More Forth's attention been called to the mis-construction that
Dur
being drawn to defective notice which had been sent to me, previously to tr
" might be placed upon it, notwithstanding
We used to
dor
litter, this was to the inrefragable authority of the Government
unofficially and
te
give
alls Forth
rectifying his mistake which it
Gazette
opportunities Notification inserted in the weekly
and reproduced in that official publication for three Saturdays consecutively.
appears he took
the
the
included in the list submitted on
jet Instant to the bout I have named._
It
may
be that the blerk who called
at the Office of Police and Lighting Rate
on
the 3rd Instant was, in substance
informed at that office that the gathering of the Tax under emsideration had passed from the Treasury to the bount of Summary Procces but I feel confirent more could have passed.-
that nothing
With
regard
to the "Date" inserted in
the
steps to do.
An authority which could not be set
aside.
the clerical error
of
کیا گا کہ
enbordinate Officer in the office of the
Police and
Bd
Lighting Pates-
The
I have &fc:
K
(Rigued) Fred Forth
error
de Souza
fallen into
by Mr
within
may by implication ame:
:
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.